ABSTRACT
Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV‐1) is a very common infection often localized in the mucocutaneous junction of the lip. Rarely, it could be detected also in periodontal tissues, associated with an elevated risk of periodontal disease progression and gingival recessions. Recently, HSV‐1 and numerous co‐infections have been reported in literature associated with the Coronavirus and subsequent COVID‐19 disease. This report illustrates a case of HSV‐1 in a patient with Covid‐19 infection, showing the presence of ulcers and vesicles on the gingival margin of maxillary teeth associated with soreness and pain. The histology highlighted the presence of intraepithelial cell ballooning, confirming the diagnosis of HSV‐1 infection. This report illustates a case of HSV‐1 in a patient with Covid‐19 infection, showing the presence of ulcers and vescicles on the gingival margin of naxillary teeth, associated with gingival recession.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has greatly modified outpatient follow-ups. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the organizational modalities and clinical effects of rearrangements of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) outpatient visits performed in our centers at Ravenna and Lugo Hospitals, Italy, during the pandemic outbreak in 2020. METHODS: All scheduled in-person device follow-up visits in March-December 2020 have been considered. On the basis of documented past functioning of each device and of remote monitoring (RM) capabilities, in-person visits were either performed or postponed at variable times. The characteristics of the follow-ups and the device-related clinically relevant events were analyzed, the latter being further divided into serious malfunction and problems to be corrected by device reprogramming. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of in-person visits were postponed (n = 576) (36% of ICDs and 25% of PMs), peaking 62% in March-May 2020. RM compensated nearly all hold-ups in ICDs and just 63% of postponements in PMs. The postponement-caused delay between in-person visits was 5.6 ± 1.1 months for ICDs and 4.7 ± 1.2 months for PMs; in 24% of ICDs the time interval between in-person visits was ≥18 months. Clinically relevant events were 56 (18 [4.4%] in ICDs, 38 [2.1%] in PMs), with no deaths and 21 serious malfunctions (4 [1%] in ICDs, 15 [0.8%] in PMs). RM identified all ICD malfunctions, while it was not available in the affected PMs. In comparison with the year 2019, serious malfunctions increased, though the difference was not significant. Monthly RM transmissions increased by 2.3 fold. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous in-person PM/ICD follow-up visits were postponed, and delays were well beyond the previously recommended time limits. However, device-related malfunctions did not increase, notably, when RM capabilities were used.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Electronics , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Introduction There has been a recent rise in public perception that vaccines are unsafe, fostering vaccine hesitancy (VH). Few interventions have focused on teaching medical students’ communication skills for counseling vaccine-hesitant patients. Methods Our educational intervention, designed for medical students, involved a self-study module followed by an interactive session on VH. Students practiced counseling vaccine-hesitant standardized patients (SPs). Faculty and SPs assessed student counseling skills. Students completed pre- and post-intervention surveys to assess attitudes and preparedness to counsel VH patients. Results Students showed a better ability to talk to parents about Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine concerns and Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR)/autism-related issues than to address patients’ concerns related to the Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) vaccine. Students’ surveys pre- and post-intervention revealed significant improvement in their vaccination knowledge and comfort with counseling vaccine-hesitant patients. Student counseling skills as part of an Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) showed 73% of students asked about immunization and elicited SP concerns, but only 36% counseled appropriately. Conclusions In the face of emerging VH, physicians play a critical role in advising and influencing vaccination decisions. Therefore, it is a core responsibility of medical educators to train medical students on recommending vaccinations and responding effectively to vaccine-hesitant parents and patients. Our multifaceted interactive session provided preclinical students with knowledge and skills to improve communication skills with VH patients and parents and the need for ongoing practice of these VH counseling skills.